The alternatives to novelizations are not many. I
propose two possibilities. The first, rather than presenting the film to the world
as a direct repetition of the plot and dialogue, the author might publish something
in the realm of a graphic novel. Ideally, the words and images would come
together to make a more viable mixture of the visual and verbal systems that
pose such a problem to the novelization. The book would become available after
the film has already arrived in theaters (or at least after a final cut of the
film has been made) in order to preserve accuracy of plot and characterization.
The second solution falls closer to the world of fan
fiction. Again, rather than giving us the film in book form, an author might
provide the backstory for one or two characters that end up interacting during
familiar events from the film. For example, what is Selina Kyle’s history? What
has brought her to where she is today? Where has Talia been for the eight years
of peace in Gotham? Preferably, the books
would be independent of the film, approved by the author, and could be enjoyed
and discussed without having seen the film itself. The Star Wars and Star Trek
universes have experienced great success with this type of literature.
Based on my analysis of novelizations’ negative
aspects, it may appear that I am of the opinion that novels themselves should
be nothing but psychological character studies with no action, imagination, or
creativity. I disagree with that view. Adventure, spy, and fantasy stories are
all viable forms of the novel and each has its own merit. Writers such as
Alexandre Dumas and J. K. Rowling have proved their worth as legitimate yet
exciting novelists. In any novel, the readers must imagine and “see” with their
mind’s eye. However, the novel is written to be read and imagined; the film is
meant to be seen and heard. The author of novel knows that the reader won’t see
with their actual eyes what is taking place and they account for that. The
screenwriter knows that the audience will be unable to get inside a character’s
mind and accounts for that. The dilemma is that when a novel tries to be a film
in book form, problems arise in the same way they would in the case of a film
that followed its source novel to the letter. When the screenwriter or
novelizer attempts to take a work in its original format and implement it exactly
manner in another, the transmedialization process does not work. The lack of
intermediality combined with intrinsic commercial motives render the
novelization an ultimately failed project.
No comments:
Post a Comment